ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy is critical for achieving HIV RNA suppression in people living with HIV and for preventing HIV infection in uninfected individuals using preexposure prophylaxis. However, a high level of adherence can be challenging to achieve for people living with HIV on lifelong ARVs and for HIV-negative individuals using daily preexposure prophylaxis who are not at daily risk for HIV infection. Current biological measures of adherence are invasive and use bioanalytical methods that do not allow for real-time feedback during a clinic visit. This study was designed to test the feasibility and acceptability of using MedViewer, a novel, minimally invasive, hair-based assay that measures longitudinal ARV drug adherence in real time and provides an output for provider-patient discussion. OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives were to investigate the feasibility of delivering the MedViewer results as planned, the acceptability of participation in a discussion of the MedViewer results, and the appropriateness of using MedViewer for adherence counseling. The secondary objectives were to investigate additional dimensions of feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of using the MedViewer test during a routine clinic visit for people with HIV. METHODS: The proposed study was a single-arm cross-sectional study among patients receiving HIV care and providers of HIV care in a southeastern infectious disease clinic. The study originally planned to implement the MedViewer test with 50 eligible patients who were living with HIV across 2 viral load strata (undetectable or detectable plasma HIV RNA over the previous 2 years), administer brief visit-specific questionnaires to all patient and provider participants, and conduct qualitative in-depth interviews and quantitative end-line questionnaires with a subsample of patient participants (n=30) and all provider participants. RESULTS: The Establishing Novel Antiretroviral Imaging for Hair to Elucidate Nonadherence study was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and approved by the local institutional review board on November 4, 2019. Provider participant enrollment began on January 17, 2020, and patient participant enrollment began on January 22, 2020. Participant enrollment was halted on March 16, 2020, because of the COVID-19 pandemic (16 providers and 10 patients on study). Study activities resumed on February 2, 2021, with COVID-19 modifications approved by the local institutional review board. Participant enrollment closed on October 8, 2021, and data collection closed on November 15, 2021. In total, 36 unique patient participants, representing 37 samples, and 20 provider participants were enrolled. Data analysis and manuscript writing will take place throughout 2023. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the data collected through this study will provide important insights regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of incorporating new real-time longitudinal, minimally invasive adherence tests into routine clinical care and identify potential barriers to medication adherence among patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04232540; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04232540. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/41188.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was an early and widely adopted putative therapy for severe COVID-19. Results from randomized control trials and observational studies have failed to demonstrate a clear therapeutic role for CCP for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Underlying these inconclusive findings is a broad heterogeneity in the concentrations of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) between different CCP donors. We conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nAb titer-defined CCP in adults admitted to an academic referral hospital. Patients positive by a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test and with symptoms for <10 days were eligible. Participants received either CCP with nAb titers of >1:640 (high-titer group) or ≥1:160 to 1:640 (standard-titer group) in addition to standard of care treatments. The primary clinical outcome was time to hospital discharge, with mortality and respiratory support evaluated as secondary outcomes. Adverse events were contrasted by CCP titer. Between 28 August and 4 December 2020, 316 participants were screened, and 55 received CCP, with 14 and 41 receiving high- versus standard-titer CCP, respectively. Time to hospital discharge was shorter among participants receiving high- versus standard-titer CCP, accounting for death as a competing event (hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 3.58; Gray's P = 0.02). Severe adverse events (SAEs) (≥grade 3) occurred in 4 (29%) and 23 (56%) of participants receiving the high versus standard titer, respectively, by day 28 (risk ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.22; Fisher's P = 0.12). There were no observed treatment-related AEs. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04524507). IMPORTANCE In this study, in a high-risk population of patients admitted for COVID-19, we found an earlier time to hospital discharge among participants receiving CCP with nAb titers of >1:640 compared with participants receiving CCP with a lower nAb titer and no CCP-related AEs. The significance of our research is in identifying a dose response of CCP and clinical outcomes based on nAb titer. Although limited by a small study size, these findings support further study of high-nAb-titer CCP defined as >1:640 in the treatment of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/therapy , Immunization, Passive/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infectious virus isolation in outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with viral RNA levels and symptom duration, little is known about the host, disease, and viral determinants of infectious virus detection. METHODS: COVID-19 adult outpatients were enrolled within 7 days of symptom onset. Clinical symptoms were recorded via patient diary. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected to quantitate SARS-CoV-2 RNA by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and for infectious virus isolation in Vero E6-cells. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured in serum using a validated ELISA assay. RESULTS: Among 204 participants with mild-to-moderate symptomatic COVID-19, the median nasopharyngeal viral RNA was 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.7-7.6 log10 copies/mL), and 26% had detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgM, IgG, and/or total Ig) at baseline. Infectious virus was recovered in 7% of participants with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies compared to 58% of participants without antibodies (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .04, .36; P = .00016). Infectious virus isolation was also associated with higher levels of viral RNA (mean RNA difference +2.6 log10, 95% CI: 2.2, 3.0; P < .0001) and fewer days since symptom onset (PR = 0.79, 95% CI: .71, .88 per day; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is strongly associated with clearance of infectious virus. Seropositivity and viral RNA levels are likely more reliable markers of infectious virus clearance than subjective measure of COVID-19 symptom duration. Virus-targeted treatment and prevention strategies should be administered as early as possible and ideally before seroconversion. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04405570.